Like f*ck you! Okie I'm pretty foxed now after my drinks but it's absolutely ridiculous to base divorce just because your daughter is born ugly, under the "so-called" pretense that that your wife is born ugly!!!
Common, the baby girl could have been born ugly because the father is UGLY OKieeeeee~~~~!!!!! Is there a 100% proof that her daughter follows 100% of her mum's genes??? Common show that first!! The baby girl could have inherit her dad's genes as well and the mum shouldnt be blamed entirely for that. And is it even scientifically proven that if both parents are gorgeous, their offspring will definitely be gorgeous too? No! Moreover, looks change over time. Calling your own child "incredibly ugly" when they just come into this world is very dispassionate and unfeeling.
Like WTF!~!~! The stupid judge is passing his judgement based on ugly looks of his daughter, because it might be based of the generic genes of his wife, when in the first place, love and marriage shouldnt be judged SOLELY based on looks!! In this case, the judge is as SHALLOW as the husband and definitely dont have the right to pass a verdict!! And common, even if the wife DID deceive the husband with her looks, he damn well DESERVES it because HE, didnt go past looks and go beyond skin deep!! And he has only himself to blame!!! Like in this world, what can be real, with makeup etc? You only have the right to blame your "wife" if she wasnt born a female!
If you're attracted to good looks in the first place, no matter real or fake, just call yourself "shallow" and dont blame people for being deceiving because obviously, you dont have a heart, because heart seeks beyond looks and lasts longer.
Disclaimer: Extremely foxed now at 3.11am and any entries expressing personal views and interests shouldnt be treated seriously.
*entry being edited the next day in sober status for inaccuracies in facts. Haha!*
After dearie read this entry, he told me that the judge's decision is not so much based on the ugly child born out of the inherited genes but rather on the pretext that the wife has in a way, deceived the husband with her entirely different artificial looks. I re-read the article again(this time when I'm perfectly sober. Haha) and agreed with him. But what can I say? While there's some degree of deceit in it, I cant help by feeling indignant about when a guy can get so carried away with looks. I'm really quite certain if the roles has reversed whereby the wife discovered the hubby has gone under the knife, she wouldnt have reacted so strongly about it, to the extent of divorcing when the child born wasnt as gorgeous. And a mother would love her child no matter how ugly or how incomplete(e.g, without limbs etc) he/she is.
In any case, she would be better off without him. Because if a father cant love his own flesh and blood just because she wasnt born gorgeous, then he has no heart at all and not worth anyone's love.